Saturday, June 2, 2018

The Big Deal

I need some catching eye candy for today's article.  Something like 'What every lazy GAT parent who want their child to excel at a top school avoiding the work it takes to get there needs to know'.

As mentioned previously, I'm trolling for useful research articles on this topic.  When I say 'avoiding the work' I really mean 'working a lot and changing how you do things', but for the child it's mainly chores and a few well spent minutes each day.  Like 15.  Or 25.

I was shocked and surprised to see an article entitled Want to Help our child succeed in school?  Add language to the math, reading mix last week.  The first time I read this article, I dismissed it because this information has been known since 1911 and I based 2 of my books on it, Pre-K Phonics Conceptual Vocabulary and Thinking or Pre-K Phonics Vocabulary and Conceptual Thinking - don't remember which, and Shape Size Color Count.  Both books have vocab up to 2nd grade. Vocab is the key.  I've said it about 372 times.  Vocab Workshop starts in K.   How many times have I recommended this as part of the curriculum?

I encourage all of you to read this article.   Let me summarize the findings for you.  Language predicts success in reading and math and social skills.  Language going into K predicts academic progress for the next 6 years.  Not much else does.

Problem solving skills were not part of this study, nor an emphasis on kids at the 90-95 level, but you can't have everything in one study unless you are desperate to get your child into a GAT program. The article also mentioned that children who entered K ahead showed less gains than children who entered behind.  Shame on those parents for dropping the ball.

I'm going to extend these results from my own findings.

  • If you overdo language from age 4 to 6, your child will be really, really far ahead in everything.  If you didn't do this, put up the Word Board for the next 2 years and catch up.
  • If you add problem solving skills to the mix, and you should, you're can get the child to the point where high performance is effortless.  This is my new goal.
I'd like to thank David Lohman for pointing out that vocabulary is 75% of the COGAT, and for making the COGAT a hurdles for GAT programs.  I once wrote put didn't publish an article entitled 'Is David Lohman Evil?'  When I compare my child's recent scores to the MAP test score chart, the scores are not on the chart.  That's what I'm talking about.   Conclusion - David Lohman is not evil, he just is not in charge of making COGAT skills part of education curriculum.

Lately, the other one has been precalculating the minimum needed to get to his selective enrollment high school and quitting once he gets there.  Arrrgggghhh.  It looks like he's there with some room to spare, and he was kind enough to blow away the math portion; we had some gaps in this area and he made an effort at my request.  Then he turned around and sluffed off on the reading which is his strong subject.  More about that in my new blog, competitiveparentmagazine.com.  I bought the url next week and will be launching soon.  These articles are hard to read on a phone.  

I'm really excited about the dynamic between reading and math at age 4 as it grows until about age 10.   I've got about 20 articles on this topic to write.  On the other hand, high school is looming and I have a goal of breezing through a rigorous AP program with a few minutes of homework a night.  That's the official goal, but it belongs in another website.




No comments:

Post a Comment